Vytautas’s hostage sons poisoned (a contested tradition)¶
What the chronicles say [Historical record]¶
Contested; a late tradition, not a recorded fact. The story that Vytautas’s two sons, held as hostages by the Order, were poisoned rests on Simon Grunau, a 16th-century Prussian chronicler, who has a knight poison „Iwan and Georg“ in revenge for the father’s betrayal. The English Wikipedia (Ostrów Agreement, citing Jonynas 1984) calls it a false rumour and notes that no reliable source knows of the sons; Sofija is the only child in the record. Vytautas’s own letters name only his sister and brother as hostages and never accuse the Order of killing sons; a „Jurgis and Jonas“ on the 1390–92 hostage list were kinsmen who came back alive. The tradition puts the poisoning after the break (the real break is July 1392, no day known) and before Ostrów (4 August). His wife Ona was released by the Order in May 1392.
Vytautas’s hostage sons poisoned (Grunau tradition, contested)
Vytautas’s hostage sons poisoned (Grunau tradition, contested) · event¶
Tipas |
įvykis |
Metai |
1392-07 |
Status |
Sagos išmonė |
Knyga |
|
Pastaba |
Tradition: the Order’s revenge after the break, before Ostrów (4 Aug 1392). |
Where: Königsberg (Karaliaučius) (on the map)
What really happened [The saga’s invention]¶
Taken up in Book II as a tradition, with the doubt voiced in-world: the sons are not on the Order’s written hostage list („the household’s escort, nobody writes those down“), and Henrik’s „kai kurie sako, kad ne“ keeps the doubt alive. After the burned forts the Order’s cook vanishes and the boys sicken at Balga. Šešiapirštis carries a Sambian ragana’s offer to draw the poison for the blood of an Order child; Vytautas says „Ne“ (the forbidden transfer of the wound). The boys die that morning, herb-lore, mundane. Šešiapirštis dies afterwards. This ends Form 4 and deepens Ona’s silence.
Consequences¶
Caused by the break at Ritterswerder (the Order’s revenge, per the tradition). It precedes the Agreement of Ostrów, as in the book.
Dramatisation¶
Book II ch. 9 „Kraujo Puta“ (Vytautas and Šešiapirštis; spring to summer 1392; the Neman and Prussia), with ch. 6 (the hostage list) and ch. 10 (Henrik: „some say no“). Ona’s grief is in ch. 10 and ch. 20. The afterword says plainly that the tradition is Grunau’s and that the saga chose it.
Ryšiai
Caused by: The break: Ritterswerder guests seized, Order forts burned — Contested tradition: the Order’s revenge after the break, before Ostrów.
Location: Königsberg (Karaliaučius) — Place uncertain.
Participants: Vytautas’s sons Jurgis and Ivanas (hostages; contested)
Sąsajos¶
graph LR
ev_ritterswerder_1392["The break: Ritterswerder guests seized, Order forts burned"]
ev_sons_poisoned["Vytautas's hostage sons poisoned (Grunau tradition, contested)"]
konigsberg["Königsberg (Karaliaučius)"]
vytautas_sons["Vytautas's sons Jurgis and Ivanas (hostages; contested)"]
ev_sons_poisoned -->|Location| konigsberg
vytautas_sons -->|Took part in| ev_sons_poisoned
ev_ritterswerder_1392 -->|Causes| ev_sons_poisoned
style ev_sons_poisoned stroke-width:3px